Repairman’s Lien
Case: Embraer Aircraft Maintenance Serv., Inc, v, Aerocentry Corp., No. 3:13-cv-00059 (M.D.T.N).
Issues:
- May a repairman’s lien arising under Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-19-101 be enforced by a method other than attachment of the lien-subject property itself?
- Under what circumstances, if any, may a court attach the proceeds of the sale of lien-subject property, or otherwise reach them with a judgment, where the owner has rendered attachment of the lien-subject property impracticable or impossible after the initiation of a foreclosure proceeding?
Review Granted: August 19, 2016.
Note: This cases arises as a certified question from federal district court. The Supreme Court granted review of the two issues as stated above.
Recent Articles
Should You Hire a Local Attorney after an Accident on Vacation?
Legal Rights for Tourists Injured in a Car Accident in Nashville
Can I Still Recover Compensation if I Was Partly at Fault in the Accident?
What to Do if You’re Injured while Visiting Nashville
Hit-and-Run Accident? Here’s How to Protect Your Legal Claim
What Passengers Need to Know About Filing a Lawsuit After an Accident
Categories
Criminal Law
Civil Rights
In The News
Texting and Driving
David Raybin
Hot List
Personal Injury
Car Accidents
Ben Raybin
Social Security Disability
Domestic Violence
General