Repairman’s Lien
Case: Embraer Aircraft Maintenance Serv., Inc, v, Aerocentry Corp., No. 3:13-cv-00059 (M.D.T.N).
Issues:
- May a repairman’s lien arising under Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-19-101 be enforced by a method other than attachment of the lien-subject property itself?
- Under what circumstances, if any, may a court attach the proceeds of the sale of lien-subject property, or otherwise reach them with a judgment, where the owner has rendered attachment of the lien-subject property impracticable or impossible after the initiation of a foreclosure proceeding?
Review Granted: August 19, 2016.
Note: This cases arises as a certified question from federal district court. The Supreme Court granted review of the two issues as stated above.
Recent Articles
David Raybin Criminal Defense partner at Raybin and Weissman P C selected for the Best Lawyers in America
What is The Average SSD Payment in Tennessee
What are The DUI Laws in Nashville
Raybin & Weissman, P.C., Partner David Weissman Selected for The Best Lawyers in America - Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs
Raybin & Weissman, P.C. Secure Not Guilty Verdict for Security Guard Accused of Second-Degree Murder
Sexual Assault Abuse and Harassment on College Campuses
Categories
In The News
Texting and Driving
David Raybin
Hot List
Criminal Law
Ben Raybin
Personal Injury