Dave was extremely professional but more importantly I was treated as a person not a case. He always returned calls and emails in a very timely manner. I would definitely recommend Dave to help with legal needs! -Jennifer S.

As someone who never had a lawyer, David made everything as simple as possible. He is very easy to communicate with and provides all the answers and support you will ever need. If I ever need a lawyer again, David will be my first choice to contact. -Andrew

I was falsely accused of something and had an order filed against me. Ben represented me during court and successfully had the order dismissed. He also went above and beyond to make sure it would not show up on my record. – Brittany.

Home » Blog » Criminal Savings Statute

Criminal Savings Statute


Case:  State of Tennessee v. Marvin Maurice DeBerry

Facts:  Defendant was convicted of driving after having been declared a motor vehicle habitual offender (“MVHO”). After his conviction but prior to his sentencing, an amendment to the statute that was the basis of his MVHO conviction went into effect, so that the Defendant’s conduct was no longer criminalized and, concomitantly, triggered no penalty. The trial court, after initially sentencing the Defendant to serve five years, modified the Defendant’s judgment to reflect that he was to be subjected to no penalty.

Appellate Decision:  The intermediate court affirmed the reduction of the punishment to no penalty, holding that the savings statute in Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-11-112 applies because Legislature’s act of removing punishment for the offense constitutes a lesser penalty.

Review Granted:  September 23, 2021.

Prediction:  Ben thinks the Supreme Court will affirm and hold that no penalty should be imposed for the reasons stated by the intermediate court.