Dave was extremely professional but more importantly I was treated as a person not a case. He always returned calls and emails in a very timely manner. I would definitely recommend Dave to help with legal needs! -Jennifer S.

As someone who never had a lawyer, David made everything as simple as possible. He is very easy to communicate with and provides all the answers and support you will ever need. If I ever need a lawyer again, David will be my first choice to contact. -Andrew

I was falsely accused of something and had an order filed against me. Ben represented me during court and successfully had the order dismissed. He also went above and beyond to make sure it would not show up on my record. – Brittany.

Home » Blog » Comparative Fault

Comparative Fault


Case: Carolyn Crisp v. Michael Nelms

Issue: Was “paceline” cycler at least 50% at fault for accident as a matter of law?

Facts: Plaintiff died while bicycling in a “paceline” group. His surviving spouse sued other cyclists, alleging they had slowed down suddenly. Defendants were granted summary judgment on the basis that paceline cycling is inherently dangerous such that the decedent was at least 50% at fault.

Appellate Decision: The intermediate court reversed, holding that there is a question of fact as to whether Defendants slowed down suddenly and whether a reasonable jury could find the decedent less than 50% at fault.

Review Granted: August 8, 2018.

Prediction: Ben thinks the Supreme Court is likely to affirm. The degree of inherent danger posed by paceline cycling and the alleged negligence of the Defendants are classic jury determinations rather than matters of law.